~ It's Time to Rise and Shine ~
We as spiritual beings or souls come to earth in order to experience the human condition. This includes the good and the bad scenarios of this world. Our world is a duality planet and no amount of love or grace will eliminate evil or nastiness. We will return again and again until we have pierced the illusions of this density. The purpose of human life is to awaken to universal truth. This also means that we must awaken to the lies and deceit mankind is subjected to. To pierce the third density illusion is a must in order to remove ourselves from the wheel of human existences. Love is the Aswer by means of Knowledge and Awareness! |
Questions about George W. Bush's Business Career Riling the lapdogs Joe Conason Salon.com July 11, 2002 Mainstream journalists are starting to pose hard questions about George W. Bush's business career -- the kind of questions that gave way two years ago to more urgent issues like the color of Al Gore's suits and the "authenticity" of Bill Bradley and John McCain. Wednesday, reporters in the White House press room requested copies of the Harken Energy board minutes from 1989 and 1990. Those are the same minutes that the president urged the press to consult during his Monday press conference. But the answer from the White House communications office is that those minutes won't be made available. Spokesman Dan Bartlett said that the White House doesn't have the records, although Bush himself certainly once did, and as president could surely request them again. The Harken board minutes would show whether and how he participated in the deceptive purchase of a company subsidiary, Aloha Petroleum, by a firm that included the Harken chairman and other insiders. On Monday, Bush seemed to indicate that he couldn't remember his view of the Aloha scheme. Maybe he enthusiastically endorsed it, which wouldn't look so good right now; or maybe he was the kind of "independent director" who yawned, collected his fees and stock options and rubber-stamped management, which wouldn't look so good now either. If he had opposed that Aloha deal, he would probably remember it well. And if he or his lawyers are keeping those yellowed board minutes in an old trunk anywhere, that's one Pandora's box they're not opening. Still, there are clues to be found in the publicly available documents. Harken's proxy statement for its annual stockholders meeting on Nov. 18, 1990, mentions aspects of the Aloha Petroleum sale. In a footnote on Page 20, the statement explains that "the sale price was ... approved by independent directors of HMC," or Harken Marketing Company, then a subsidiary of Harken Energy. Weren't the "independent directors" of HMC identical with those on the board of Harken Energy, including George W. Bush? A glance at those proxy statements, available at the SEC's EDGAR site, might refresh the president's dim recollection. Do as I say The same proxy statement also shows that Bush got personal loans from Harken totaling more than $180,000 to purchase company stock. As the Washington Post and the New York Times headline Thursday, the president now says such loans to directors should be outlawed because they tend to discourage the borrowers from exercising critical judgment about management decisions. I guess he would know. (The Times story, by Jeff Gerth and Richard W. Stevenson, is well reported and scoops the sweetheart aspects of the loans. It also poses new, unanswered questions about which "institutional investor" purchased Bush's 212,000 shares at a time when they were clearly declining in value. The broker who arranged the deal won't say.) Why was Bush on Harken's board? What hasn't been discussed much lately is why Harken management wanted George W. Bush on its board, why they paid millions for his worthless, debt-ridden Spectrum 7 oil company in 1986, why they continued to pay him a handsome $120,000 consulting fee and how his association finally paid off for them. Months before Bush cashed out most of his stock in June 1990, he had attracted the benign attention of the Gulf sheikdom of Bahrain. The sheiks generously awarded an exclusive offshore drilling contract to Harken -- despite the fact that the small, poorly run company had neither the experience nor the capital for such a huge venture. The story in today's Times notes that the Bass oil interests of Fort Worth were completing a deal with Harken to do the real work in Bahrain around the same time that Bush sold his shares. That "good news" about the Bass family briefly pumped Harken's stock price a month after Bush sold. But the much bigger news was the Bahrain deal itself, which had been announced six months earlier. And apparently it was during the discussions in 1989 with the Bahraini authorities -- which began after Bush Senior became president -- that Harken gave Bush, but no other outside director, another sweetheart loan of $84,000. There is much more to be said about the Bahrain deal, and there are many reporters in Washington who know a lot about it -- including one very high-ranking editor in the Times Washington bureau. Digging up those old stories would lead to some very contemporary angles about the Bush family's Saudi friends. - - - - - - - - - - - - About the writer Joe Conason writes a daily journal for Salon. He also writes a weekly column for the New York Observer. ***** Stocks Careen To 1997 Lows - Confidence In Economy Plummets By Denise Duclaux 7-10-2 NEW YORK (Reuters) - Major U.S. stock gauges slammed to lows unseen since 1997 on Wednesday after Qwest Communications International Inc. inflamed worries over corporate accounting and Standard & Poor's booted a handful of companies from its prestigious index. "There are no buyers and that's a proxy for a major lack of confidence in U.S. companies," said Gary Wedbush, head of trading at Wedbush Morgan Securities. Wall Street has suffered three straight days of deep declines. The market has been on a mostly downward spiral as blow-ups like WorldCom Inc.'s $3.85 billion accounting scandal, fears of another terror attack on the United States and apprehension over the upcoming quarterly earnings season rattle the market. Qwest lost almost one-third of its value after federal prosecutors launched an unspecified criminal probe into the No. 4 U.S. local phone company. The latest in a string of high-profile investigations into Corporate America dealt another stinging blow to investor confidence. Royal Dutch slumped nearly 10 percent after the Anglo-Dutch oil group and six other foreign firms were yanked from the S&P 500 index to be replaced with seven U.S. companies. Money managers dumped the foreign shares to make room for the new members of the benchmark index. Selling intensified as the closing bell approached. The S&P 500 skidded 32.36 points, or 3.40 percent, to 920.47, based on the latest available numbers, hitting its lowest level since October 1997. The blue-chip Dow Jones industrial average tumbled 282.59 points, or 3.11 percent, to 8,813.50 -- its largest one-day percentage loss since September 2001. The technology-loaded Nasdaq Composite index sank 35.11 points, or 2.54 percent, to 1,346.01, ending at its lowest level since May 1997. "The mood is relatively sullen," said Jack Schwetje, a senior equities trader at Deutsche Bank. "All the up moves have been sold. It hasn't made much sense to get involved over the last couple of weeks." Losers trounced winners by a ratio of about 3 to 1 on the New York Stock Exchange and about 2 to 1 on Nasdaq. More than 1.78 billion shares changed hands on the Big Board and more than 1.79 billion on Nasdaq in active trading. The market has suffered a staggering loss of nearly $7 trillion since hitting an all-time high on March 24, 2000 -- reflecting a 40 percent tumble in the Wilshire Total Market Index. The total U.S. stock market is now valued at about $10.4 trillion. Yahoo! Inc. emerged as a bright spot after a dismal session by snapping a string of six consecutive quarterly losses. The Internet media company after the bell posted a second-quarter profit and higher revenues, with the help of new fees on services. Yahoo ticked up to $12.54 in after-hours trade after ending down 51 cents at $12.19. During regular hours, Qwest tumbled 83 cents to $1.77. Qwest, the dominant local phone company in 14 states from Minnesota to Washington, said it was not told the subject of the criminal probe by the U.S. Attorney's office in Denver. A Qwest spokesman declined to comment on whether investigators have asked the company for any documents. Stock-market index compiler S&P sent seven foreign companies reeling after saying it would yank them from its S&P 500 index to create a U.S.-based benchmark. Royal Dutch fell $5.16 to $50.73. Consumer products giant Unilever lost $4.15 to $60.97. Canadian firms Nortel Networks, Alcan, Barrick Gold, Placer Dome and Inco also slumped on news of their impending exit. S&P said it would replace the foreign companies with seven U.S. firms, including United Parcel Service ; Electronic Arts Inc. ; Ebay Inc. ; Goldman Sachs Group Inc. ; Prudential Financial Inc. ; Principal Financial Group Inc. ; and SunGard Data Systems Inc. . All those stocks rose. Accounting concerns spread to the White House. A public interest group sued Vice President Dick Cheney and the oil services company he once ran, Halliburton Co., alleging they defrauded shareholders by overstating the company's revenues. Halliburton shares fell 57 cents to $13.55. The civil lawsuit was filed in federal court one day after President Bush went to Wall Street to outline proposals aimed at stopping the accounting scandals that have shaken investor faith in U.S. financial markets. Auto makers added more pressure to the market. General Motors Corp., the world's largest auto maker and a Dow component, lost $3.53 to $47.61, and rival Ford Motor Co. dropped $1.12 to $13.99. Banc of America cut the car giants to "market perform" from "buy" due to concerns over competitive industry pricing. Pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co. slumped $2.18 to $43.57. The Dow component delayed the $980 million public sale of its Medco Health Solutions Inc. pharmacy unit for a third time, as turbulent markets sapped investor demand for new shares. Cisco Systems Inc., up 37 cents at $13.51, emerged as a bright spot in a solemn market. Merrill Lynch raised the rating on the Web gear giant to "strong buy" from "buy," saying it expected an imminent turnaround in the network equipment sector. ***** The Insider Game Paul Krugman New York Times An aside: Some pundits have tried to dismiss questions about Mr. Bush's business career as unfair — it was long ago, and hence irrelevant. Yet many of these same pundits thought it was perfectly appropriate to spend seven years and $70 million investigating a failed land deal that was even further in Bill Clinton's past. And if they want something more recent, how about reporting on the story of Mr. Bush's extraordinarily lucrative investment in the Texas Rangers, which became so profitable because of a highly incestuous web of public policy and private deals? As in the case of Harken, no hard work is necessary; Joe Conason laid it all out in Harper's almost two years ago. But the Harken story still has more to teach us, because the S.E.C. investigation into Mr. Bush's stock sale is a perfect illustration of why his tough talk won't scare well-connected malefactors. Mr. Bush claims that he was "vetted" by the S.E.C. In fact, the agency's investigation was peculiarly perfunctory. It somehow decided that Mr. Bush's perfectly timed stock sale did not reflect inside information without interviewing him, or any other members of Harken's board. Maybe top officials at the S.E.C. felt they already knew enough about Mr. Bush: his father, the president, had appointed a good friend as S.E.C. chairman. And the general counsel, who would normally make decisions about legal action, had previously been George W. Bush's personal lawyer — he negotiated the purchase of the Texas Rangers. I am not making this up... ***** http://www.mediawhoresonline.com BUSH STONEWALLED FEDS ON HARKEN The Gun Before the Smoking Gun? Harken Shocker -- But What's In The Whole File??? Pressure Builds on White House To Come Clean A newly released batch of long-sealed S.E.C. documents from 1990 and 1991 shows that George W. Bush has dissembled for years on crucial matters connected to the Harken Energy deal, and to the S.E.C. investigation of the deal. Until now, though with the story changing constantly, Bush has insisted that he complied and cooperated with the SEC, but that certain intended mishaps got in the way. In 1994, Bush claimed that he and his lawyers had returned proper SEC disclosure forms about the deal in a timely fashion, but that the SEC had mislaid them. Then, in recent days, Bush's spokesman Ari Fleicher changed the story, saying that there had been some mix-up on the forms with the Harken lawyers. Then, in a press conference earlier this week, Bush claimed that he doesn't really know what had happened with the forms. Eventually, the forms reached the SEC. But as the newly-released documents, obtained by the Center for Public Integrity, now prove, Bush and his lawyers were also involved in a firm stonewalling action to keep the SEC from acquiring all of the documentation it wanted to see regarding the Harken transaction. In fact, as late as June 1991, Bush's lawyers were deliberately holding back the requested information from the SEC, basing their actions on "attorney-client privilege." And although Bush himself provided what the SEC called "a small amount of information" voluntarily, it provided, according to the SEC investigators, "little insight as to what Harken nonpublic information he knew and when he knew it." The crucial SEC memorandum, from Herbert Janick and Paul Gerlach of the Enforcement Division is dated July 17, 1991. The last of the newly-released documents, a letter dated July 25, 1991, from Janick to Baker & Botts attorney Joseph A. Cilaone 2nd, who represented both Bush and Harken, shows the SEC requesting additional documentation connected with the Harken deal, that might provide more insight. Bottom line: Months after he supposedly complied with the SEC, Bush, along with his lawyer, was trying to conceal crucial information about the Harken deal from the SEC. All of which raises huge new questions: -- What did Bush and his lawyers have to hide? -- Might one of the things they tried to hide have been the mysterious investor who bought up Bush's Harken stock? -- Why did Bush say he had cooperated with the SEC when, in 1991, he did not? -- When will Bush finally permit release of the full file to clear up the mounting appearance of gross impropriety and even outright securities fraud? Developing with legs.... *** HARKEN FIRESTORM THREATENS BUSH WHITE HOUSE ALOHA, DUBYA! More Harken Sleaze Exposed in New Documents How George W. Bush Pulled A Kenny Boy In the latest dramatic disclosure from the dribble of newly-secured government documents, the Los Angeles Times has confirmed that, while a director of Harken Energy Corporation, George W. Bush approved a deal virtually identical to the deals at the heart of the current Enron scandal. In early 1989, George W. Bush and his fellow board members at Harken Energy Corp. were presiding over a company that was headed south in a hurry. The Dallas-based oil firm had lost millions of dollars placing bad bets on commodity futures. Debt was piling up; red ink was beginning to flow. Harken's executives came up with a novel plan to ease the pain. They would sell a small chain of Hawaiian gas stations called Aloha Petroleum to a group of investors that included Harken's chairman and one of its directors. The buyers would pay $1 million up front, but the accountants would record an immediate $7.9-million profit, enough to erase most of Harken's losses for the year. They made a point of seeking the approval of directors who were not participants in the investor group. Bush, a member of the board's audit committee, signed off on the deal, according to Harken documents. So did the company's outside auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co. But the government challenged and ultimately overturned the accounting method used by Harken to post a gain on the sale. Aloha was sold a second time, and the new buyer extracted big concessions from the company. The initial profit recorded on the sale morphed into a big loss. In the midst of all the maneuvering, Bush sold most of his Harken stock in June 1990. Sound familiar? The Aloha sale was so similar to what Enron Corp. did to hide its losses that Harken could have served as a model for the now-disgraced company, one accounting expert said. "The people at Enron could have gone to school on this thing," said Alfred King, former managing director of the Institute of Management Accountants, vice chairman of Milwaukee-based Valuation Research Corp. and former advisor to the Financial Accounting Standards Board. "They sold to themselves and recorded a profit," King said. "That's exactly what Enron did on a number of those off-balance-sheet transactions. On this one transaction at least, it's almost identical." What's that, we hear from the White House? Sometimes things just aren't so black-and-white when it comes to accounting? Developing, along with all of the other new document stories.... As a Board Member, Bush OKd a Deal Like Enron's Los Angeles Times, July 12, 2000 ***** SEC Chairman Refuses To Resign Or Release Bush Harken Docs By Marilyn Geewax Atlanta Journal-Constitution Staff Writer 7-13-2 WASHINGTON -- Harvey Pitt, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said Friday that he "absolutely" will not resign and that he has the full support of President Bush. "I have a big job to do," said Pitt, the nation's chief regulator of financial markets. Pitt spoke in an exclusive interview with Cox Newspapers, his first since a growing number of accounting scandals sparked calls for his resignation by high-profile lawmakers of both major political parties. Pitt said he has no plans to release additional SEC documents involving Bush's sale of Harken Energy Co. stock in 1990. Critics recently questioned whether Bush benefited from inside information before selling the stock. The president has acknowledged that lawyers at Harken belatedly filed paperwork with the SEC related to the sale. Pitt said he didn't think the release to the public of all the documents would quiet questions about the president's business dealings at Harken. "The reason is, first of all, I don't think the president's credibility needs to be increased," he said. "And second, this was thoroughly investigated a decade ago. It was meticulously done . . . so the issue at this juncture is political." Just before Friday's interview at his SEC office, Pitt met with Bush at the White House to lay out strategies for a new anti-fraud task force, described by Bush as a SWAT team that will crack down on accounting fraud and other kinds of corporate wrongdoing. The panel includes Pitt, Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson, Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller. Pitt said Bush's support for him "has been clear all along. . . . It has never wavered." The president, Pitt said, knows he will be a tough crime fighter because Bush "is aware of what we are actually doing" at the SEC to enforce laws. "I am enormously grateful for his support." In recent days, more critics have demanded Pitt resign, saying he is the wrong man for the job because he spent 23 years representing the accounting and securities firms he now must police. On Thursday, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said the agency needs a new leader "whose background and record leave no question" about the SEC's independence and authority. Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) said Pitt's "cozy relationship" with accountants calls into question "whether or not he has the credibility to be the independent regulator he needs to be." Attacks are 'political' Pitt said such attacks are "political diatribes" that ignore facts, and he does not agree with those who say he has become a political liability to Bush and to Republicans running for office in November. "If you look at the people who criticize, you'll notice that all of their criticisms are generic -- they're just sound bites," he said. "No one who sees what we have done could doubt that this is the most effective SEC in history." Pitt said the SEC has stepped up its pace of enforcement actions and issued numerous new reporting rules and regulations. "My obligation is to serve the public," he said. "After November, after all of the critics have moved on to the next issue, I'm still going to be here cleaning up the mess" in the accounting world. Pitt is not daunted by the scope of that task, he said. "This is a historic period -- I want to be part of the solution." He said he was devastated to learn of accounting irregularities at Enron, WorldCom, Xerox and other major corporations that have led to the loss of tens of thousands of jobs and hundreds of billions of dollars in retirement savings. "You look at an Enron or a WorldCom, and to me it's devastating," he said. "I won't tolerate it. I will make certain that we do everything in our power to restore the integrity and quality of the accounting profession." Throughout his career, first as a young SEC lawyer and then as an attorney in private practice, Pitt, 57, has been praised for his legal brilliance and diligent work habits. But the events of his first year as SEC chairman have been daunting. By his own count, he already has faced four crisises: the economic fallout from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the Enron accounting debacle, the felony conviction of accounting firm Arthur Andersen and a stock market plunge tied to the loss of investor confidence. Pitt may have set himself up for criticism in October, just a month after taking office, when he made a speech to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He promised a new era at the SEC, saying the commission "has not, of late, always been a kinder and gentler place for accountants." That phrase has been used time and again to suggest he won't be tough enough on criminal conduct in the industry. "People are misconstruing what I said," Pitt said Friday. Accountants used to be reluctant to call the SEC for advice, he said. He was only suggesting that his staff would be more willing to sit down with companies and their auditors to explain the law, and be sure they are following it, he said. His words were taken "wholly out of context" because some people want "to make political capital." Responsible or timid? Critics have said Pitt is not aggressive enough, that he asked for a budget increase of $100 million for more staff, yet Congress since has made it clear it would give him about three times as much. "I wasn't being too timid. I was being responsible" in asking for a modest amount in his first year in office, Pitt said. "I wanted to make a top-to-bottom study of our efficiency" to determine exactly what the budget ought to be. "We are doing that now," he said. "It will be done by the end of the summer, at which point we may well ask for additional people. But at least our request will be scientific, not this, 'Let's see who can outbid whom and who can come up with the largest number.' " |